“Web Design Is Dead.” No, It Isn’t.

Every now and then we see discussions proclaiming a profound change in the way we design and build websites. Be it progressive enhancement1, the role of CSS2 or, most recently, web design itself being dead3. All these articles raise valid points, but I’d argue that they often lack objectivity and balance, preferring one side of the argument over another one.

These discussions are great for testing the boundaries of what we think is (or is not) possible, and they challenge how we approach our craft, but they don’t help us as a community to evolve together. They divide us into groups and sometimes even isolate us in small camps. Chris Coyier has published a fantastic post4 recently covering the debate on the role of CSS in light of growing popularity of React.js, extensively and objectively. That’s the quality discussions we need, and that’s what keeps us evolving as a growing and maturing community.

Web technologies are fantastic — we all agree on this. Our tools, libraries, techniques and methodologies are quite fantastic, too. Sometimes they are very different and even contradictory, but they are created with the best intentions in mind, and often serve their purpose well in the specific situations they were designed for. Sometimes they contain mistakes, but we can fix them due to the nature of open source. We can submit a patch or point out solutions. It’s more difficult, but it’s much more effective.

There are a lot of unknowns to design and build for, but if we embrace unpredictability5 and if we pick a strategy to create more cohesive, consistent design systems6, we can tackle any level of complexity — in fact, we do it every single day. We solve complex problems by seeking solutions, and as we do, we make hundreds of decisions along the way. Yet sometimes we fall into the trap of choosing a solution based on our subjective preferences, not objective reasoning.

Graffiti letters stating yes
Web technologies are fantastic, and so are our tools. However, we might be focusing too much on discussions about tools instead of art direction we do when we design the web. Image source: empty_quarter7.

We tend to put things into buckets, and we tend to think in absolutes. Pro carousels or anti carousels; pro React.js or anti-React.js; for progressive enhancement or against it. But the web isn’t black and white — it’s diverse, versatile, tangled, and it requires pragmatism. We are forced to find reasonable compromises within given constraints, coming from both business and UX perspectives.

Tools aren’t good or evil; they just either fit a context or they don’t. Carousels can have their place when providing enough context to engage users (as Amazon does). React.js modules can be lazy-loaded for better performance, and progressive enhancement is foundational for making responsive websites really8, really9 fast. And even if you have extremely heavy, rich imagery, more weight doesn’t have to mean more wait10; it’s a matter of setting the right priorities, or loading priorities, to be precise.

No, web design isn’t dead. Generic solutions are dead.11 Soulless theming and quick skinning are dead. Our solutions have to be better and smarter. Fewer templates, frameworks and trends, and more storytelling, personality and character. Users crave good stories and good photography; they’re eager for good visuals and interesting layouts; they can’t wait for distinctive and remarkably delightful user experiences. This exactly should be our strategy to create websites that stand out.

There are far too many badly designed experiences out there, and there is so much work for us to do. No wonder that we are so busy with our ongoing and upcoming projects. Proclaiming our craft to be dead is counter-productive, because we’ve shown ourselves and everybody out there what we are capable of. The last fifteen years of web design were nothing if not outstanding in innovation and experimentation. And it’s not about to stop; that’s just not who we are.

If we can’t produce anything but generic work, other creatives will. The web will get better and it’s our job to make it better. It won’t be easy, but if we don’t adapt our practices and techniques, we’ll have to give way to people who can get it done better than we can — but web design itself isn’t going anywhere any time soon.

It’s up to us to decide whether we keep separating ourselves into small camps, or build the web together, seeking pragmatic solutions that work well within given contexts. We might not end up with a perfect solution every time, but we’ll have a great solution still; and more often than not it’ll be much, much better than the solution our client came to us for in the first place.

(og, ms)

Footnotes

  1. 1 http://tomdale.net/2013/09/progressive-enhancement-is-dead/
  2. 2 https://medium.com/seek-ui-engineering/the-end-of-global-css-90d2a4a06284
  3. 3 http://mashable.com/2015/07/06/why-web-design-dead/
  4. 4 https://css-tricks.com/the-debate-around-do-we-even-need-css-anymore/
  5. 5 http://timkadlec.com/2015/06/thriving-in-unpredictability/
  6. 6 http://atomicdesign.bradfrost.com/chapter-1/
  7. 7 https://www.flickr.com/photos/empty_quarter/12108068015/
  8. 8 https://www.filamentgroup.com/lab/performance-rwd.html
  9. 9 http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2014/09/08/improving-smashing-magazine-performance-case-study/
  10. 10 https://www.filamentgroup.com/lab/weight-wait.html
  11. 11 http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2015/07/06/hunt-for-the-webs-lost-soul/

The post “Web Design Is Dead.” No, It Isn’t. appeared first on Smashing Magazine.

“Web Design Is Dead.” No, It Isn’t.
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2015/07/08/web-design-is-dead-no-it-isnt/
http://rss1.smashingmagazine.com/feed/
Smashing Magazine
For Professional Web Designers and Developers

Powered by WPeMatico

If It Doesn’t Sell, It Isn’t Creative: 5 Maxims from the Golden Age of Advertising Every Marketer Should Memorize

ThinkstockPhotos-508028870-182038-edited.jpgThe Golden Age of Advertising, that twenty-year spell running through the fifties and sixties, changed how we market everything, pushing beyond merely being clever or descriptive to thinking through how the audience interacts with an ad, and how empirical research can drive its development.

The revolution pioneered by William Bernbach of BBDO and David Ogilvy of Ogilvy-Mather continues to affect how we market, with a much more pervasive presence in our lives than the marketer’s obsession with Mad Men. The lessons learned during that period provided the foundation for everything we do as inbounders.

And, like any good marketer, they enshrined those lessons in quotable, quippy headlines that are easy to remember and fun to say.

“Word of mouth is the best medium of all.” – William Bernbach

The genius behind the Volkswagen “Lemon” campaign laid out one of the core principles behind inbound marketing: that nothing sells as well as word of mouth. Most of the heavy lifting is done by getting your name out there, building your brand by having personality, being engaging and entertaining and, yes, delighting your audience.

That’s something inbound is always trying to achieve: becoming the person or business everyone thinks of first, the one that people talk about and default to, whenever a particular product or service is needed. Bernbach knew that emphasizing creativity, intelligence, and wit would build that positive word of mouth, and could even redeem a product that the public might have already written off.

Look at the Volkswagen campaign; by reclaiming an oft-repeated criticism, he found the opportunity to get people to talk about the car’s quality. And suddenly, everyone was talking about Volkwagen’s industrious little car, building mindshare and driving sales. Pun very very much intended.

This is is something inbound marketers always need to keep in mind. Building word of mouth is ultimately the goal of all inbound marketing, because it drives traffic to a client’s website more effectively than any ad campaign ever could. That’s the end of every inbound campaign: not to make the sale, but to create a brand ambassador who will fill the sales funnel for you.

“If it doesn’t sell, it isn’t creative.” – David Ogilvy

At the same time, creativity isn’t the only measure, and word of mouth that doesn’t translate into sales doesn’t do anybody any good.

As marketers, we’re necessarily creatives. We’re writers and designers with a love for the clever turn of phrase or the well-placed pun. But the most creative, clever, insightful ad in the world, if it isn’t talking to the right people or hitting the right pain points, isn’t worth making.

Ogilvy was the master of the end-game, and he always emphasized that advertising and marketing had a job to do, and that job wasn’t to be funny. He’d be funny if, and only if, that was the best way to sell the product. And sometimes it is! But sometimes it isn’t.

It’s a trap we’ve all fallen into, getting too caught up in our own cleverness and losing sight of the goal we were trying to achieve. I’ve certainly championed some less-than-ideal concepts because I hadn’t been able to separate myself from the work, and forgotten what we were trying to accomplish.

So always keep the end goal in mind rather than falling in love with your own ideas or copy. That can mean that your emails may have fewer rhetorical flourishes, and may seem to be more formulaic than you’d like; but for the truly creative person, constraints open up new ways to accomplish the goal. Think of marketing copy as a genre with its own rules – and its own goals beyond being beautiful.

“It’s not the ink, it’s the think.” – David Ogilvy

In very much the same vein, Ogilvy placed a great emphasis on data-driven, research-oriented marketing that knew what it was doing. Everything depended on planning and strategy.

It‘s so easy to think about what we do as delivering a bunch of stuff – emails, content offers, infographics. But we’re not just a machine that makes deliverables – they have to be couched in a coherent, well-thought-out, comprehensive strategy that serves the end goal. Without that planning – without the think – the ink isn’t going to do anyone any good. Instead, it’ll just be a bunch of emails sent out into the void, to nobody in particular, in the hopes of maybe getting some sales (maybe).

That’s no help to anyone.

Take the time to plan ahead. Build a content strategy and editorial calendar that aligns with your client’s seasonal goals, or even anticipates them. Plan through your email campaigns so that they both lead a reader to the sale, but are easy to drop into midway through. What you are trying to accomplish is much more important than the things you’re delivering, and you need to think through every element of your campaigns to make sure they’re working.

“Our job is to bring the dead facts to life.” – William Bernbach

But for all Ogilvy’s emphasis on fact-driven, research-oriented marketing, Bernbach knew something just as powerful: nobody wants a list of features. Those have their place, but facts need to be made compelling.

Ogilvy himself put this into practice with a 1963 ad for Rolls-Royce, with a simple headline: “At 60 miles an hour the loudest noise in this new Rolls-Royce comes from the electric clock.” A fascinating teaser that communicates much of the car’s value – and it comes straight from a massive technical document he stayed up all night studying. A dead fact – the decibel rating of the engine – brought to life by putting it in the right context.

Fact-driven, research-oriented, technically accurate, and compelling in its own right.

As marketers, this is part of our job. Not to communicate the facts, but to bring them to life, to make them sing – by presenting them just so. Sure, your computer has the fastest processor, but what does that mean to the people you want to use it? This is where the right kind of creativity comes in: in the service of, and in illumination of, those dead facts.

This context informs everything, and can bring the dullest truths to the brightest sheen.

“Properly-practiced creativity can make one ad do the work of ten.” – William Bernbach

So, one of the things that I’ve been thinking about a lot is homepage design. My agency recently launched a comprehensive website redesign, and properly designing the homepage was a major concern. We went through several different concepts, all of them beautiful and creative – but none of which were exactly what we needed.

A great website is, in many ways, a great ad; it communicates your value to your audience, showing them that you’re worth their time. But if your priority is having a beautiful website instead of an effective one, it’s only going to get in your way.

An ad or a website isn’t measured by how clever it is, or how beautiful, but by whether it’s shutting the door on your clients or sealing the deal. And the right creative is the creative that makes your project more effective. Not more beautiful. Not funnier. But better at doing the job you’ve intended for it to do.

“Always leave them wanting more.” – P.T. Barnum

While this isn’t Bernbach or Ogilvy, this maxim from legendary showman P.T. Barnum sums up how every marketing communication should end: not by closing the door, but opening it wider. The end of an email, blog, content offer, white paper, podcast, or anything else should always leave your audience clamoring for more content, more information, more engagement.

We call it “delight,” and it’s an oft-neglected part of inbound marketing. But it’s the most important part.

Because if you leave them wanting more, they’ll come back.

They’ll always come back.

download the best marketing and advertising campaigns

Powered by WPeMatico