October 2015 Income Report

I wanted to publish an honest income report for this blog… after being inspired by Esteban’s journey

So without further a do here is what I made off of TripleSEO in October.

 

tumblr_mp1jhr5dYA1qbcfcko1_500

Thanks

PS Please subscribe to my blog to find out my income in November

PPS Click on the few affiliate links I have on this on this blog and buy some stuff. Christmas is coming and my kids have their mothers spending habits.

Kthxbye

 

October 2015 Income Report by Chris D – if you enjoyed this post you can read more at TripleSEO or follow Chris on Twitter

Powered by WPeMatico

Use Verticals To Increase Reach

In the last post, we looked at how SEO has always been changing, but one thing remains constant – the quest for information.

Given people will always be on a quest for information, and given there is no shortage of information, but there is limited time, then there will always be a marketing imperative to get your information seen either ahead of the competition, or in places where the competition haven’t yet targeted.

Channels

My take on SEO is broad because I’m concerned with the marketing potential of the search process, rather than just the behaviour of the Google search engine. We know the term SEO stands for Search Engine Optimization. It’s never been particularly accurate, and less so now, because what most people are really talking about is not SEO, but GO.

Google Optimization.

Still, the term SEO has stuck. The search channel used to have many faces, including Alta Vista, Inktomi, Ask, Looksmart, MSN, Yahoo, Google and the rest, hence the label SEO. Now, it’s pretty much reduced down to one. Google. Okay, there’s BingHoo, but really, it’s Google, 24/7.

We used to optimize for multiple search engines because we had to be everywhere the visitor was, and the search engines had different demographics. There was a time when Google was the choice of the tech savvy web user. These days, “search” means “Google”. You and your grandmother use it.

But people don’t spend most of their time on Google.

Search Beyond Google

The techniques for SEO are widely discussed, dissected, debated, ridiculed, encouraged and we’ve heard all of them, many times over. And that’s just GO.

The audience we are trying to connect with, meanwhile, is on a quest for information. On their quest for information, they will use many channels.

So, who is Google’s biggest search competitor? Bing? Yahoo?

Eric Schmidt thinks it’s Amazon:

Many people think our main competition is Bing or Yahoo,” he said during a visit to a Native Instruments, software and hardware company in Berlin. “But, really, our biggest search competitor is Amazon. People don’t think of Amazon as search, but if you are looking for something to buy, you are more often than not looking for it on Amazon….Schmidt noted that people are looking for a different kind of answers on Amazon’s site through the slew of reviews and product pages, but it’s still about getting information

An important point. For the user, it’s all about “getting information”. In SEO, verticals are often overlooked.

Client Selection & Getting Seen In The Right Places

I’m going to digress a little….how do you select clients, or areas to target?

I like to start from the audience side of the equation. Who are the intended audience, what does that audience really need, and where, on the web, are they? I then determine if it’s possible/plausible to position well for this intended audience within a given budget.

There is much debate amongst SEOs about what happens inside the Google black box, but we all have access to Google’s actual output in the form of search results. To determine the level of competition, examine the search results. Go through the top ten or twenty results for a few relevant keywords and see which sites Google favors, and try to work out why.

Once you look through the results and analyze the competition, you’ll get a good feel for what Google likes to see in that specific sector. Are the search results heavy on long-form information? Mostly commercial entities? Are sites large and established? New and up and coming? Do the top sites promote visitor engagement? Who links to them and why? Is there a lot news mixed in? Does it favor recency? Are Google pulling results from industry verticals?

It’s important to do this analysis for each project, rather than rely on prescriptive methods. Why? Because Google treats sectors differently. What works for “travel” SEO may not work for “casino” SEO because Google may be running different algorithms.

Once you weed out the wild speculation about algorithms, SEO discussion can contain much truth. People convey their direct experience and will sometimes outline the steps they took to achieve a result. However, often specific techniques aren’t universally applicable due to Google treating topic areas differently. So spend a fair bit of time on competitive analysis. Look closely at the specific results set you’re targeting to discover what is really working for that sector, out in the wild.

It’s at this point where you’ll start to see cross-overs between search and content placement.

The Role Of Verticals

You could try and rank for term X, and you could feature on a site that is already ranked for X. Perhaps Google is showing a directory page or some industry publication. Can you appear on that directory page or write an article for this industry publication? What does it take to get linked to by any of these top ten or twenty sites?

Once search visitors find that industry vertical, what is their likely next step? Do they sign up for a regular email? Can you get placement on those emails? Can you get an article well placed in some evergreen section on their site? Can you advertise on their site? Figure out how visitors would engage with that site and try to insert yourself, with grace and dignity, into that conversation.

Users may by-pass Google altogether and go straight to verticals. If they like video then YouTube is the obvious answer. A few years ago when Google was pushing advertisers to run video ads they pitched YouTube as the #2 global search engine. What does it take to rank in YouTube in your chosen vertical? Create videos that will be found in YouTube search results, which may also appear on Google’s main search results.

With 200,000 videos uploaded per day, more than 600 years required to view all those videos, more than 100 million videos watched daily, and more than 300 million existing accounts, if you think YouTube might not be an effective distribution channel to reach prospective customers, think again.

There’s a branding parallel here too. If the field of SEO is too crowded, you can brand yourself as the expert in video SEO.

There’s also the ubiquitous Facebook.

Facebook, unlike the super-secret Google, has shared their algorithm for ranking content on Facebook and filtering what appears in the news feed. The algorithm consists of three components…..

If you’re selling stuff, then are you on Amazon? Many people go directly to Amazon to begin product searches, information gathering and comparisons. Are you well placed on Amazon? What does it take to be placed well on Amazon? What are people saying? What are their complaints? What do they like? What language do they use?

In 2009, nearly a quarter of shoppers started research for an online purchase on a search engine like Google and 18 percent started on Amazon, according to a Forrester Research study. By last year, almost a third started on Amazon and just 13 percent on a search engine. Product searches on Amazon have grown 73 percent over the last year while searches on Google Shopping have been flat, according to comScore

All fairly obvious, but may help you think about channels and verticals more, rather than just Google. The appropriate verticals and channels will be different for each market sector, of course. And they change over time as consumer tastes & behaviors change. At some point each of these were new: blogging, Friendster, MySpace, Digg, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, Pinterest, Snapchat, etc.

This approach will also help us gain a deeper understanding of the audience and their needs – particularly the language people use, the questions they ask, and the types of things that interest them most – which can then be fed back into your search strategy. Emulate whatever works in these verticals. Look to create a unique, deep collection of insights about your chosen keyword area. This will in turn lead to strategic advantage, as your competition is unlikely to find such specific information pre-packaged.

This could also be characterised as “content marketing”, which it is, although I like to think of it all as “getting in front of the visitors quest for information”. Wherever the visitors are, that’s where you go, and then figure out how to position well in that space.

Categories: 

Powered by WPeMatico

Mozilla Firefox Dumps Google in Favor of Yahoo! Search

Firefox users conduct over 100 billion searches per year & starting in December Yahoo! will be the default search choice in the US, under a new 5 year agreement.

Google has been the Firefox global search default since 2004. Our agreement came up for renewal this year, and we took this as an opportunity to review our competitive strategy and explore our options.

In evaluating our search partnerships, our primary consideration was to ensure our strategy aligned with our values of choice and independence, and positions us to innovate and advance our mission in ways that best serve our users and the Web. In the end, each of the partnership options available to us had strong, improved economic terms reflecting the significant value that Firefox brings to the ecosystem. But one strategy stood out from the rest.

In Russia they’ll default to Yandex & in China they’ll default to Baidu.

One weird thing about that announcement is there is no mention of Europe & Google’s dominance is far greater in Europe. I wonder if there was a quiet deal with Google in Europe, if they still don’t have their Europe strategy in place, or what their strategy is.

Added: Danny Sullivan confirmed Google remain the default search engine in Firefox in Europe.

Google paid Firefox roughly $300 million per year for the default search placement. Yahoo!’s annual search revenue is on the order of $1.8 billion per year, so if they came close to paying $300 million a year, then Yahoo! has to presume they are going to get at least a few percentage points of search marketshare lift for this to pay for itself.

It also makes sense that Yahoo! would be a more natural partner fit for Mozilla than Bing would. If Mozilla partnered with Bing they would risk developer blowback from pent up rage about anti-competitive Internet Explorer business practices from 10 or 15 years ago.

It is also worth mentioning our recent post about how Yahoo! boosts search RPM by doing about a half dozen different tricks to preference paid search results while blending in the organic results.

  Yahoo Ads Yahoo Organic Results
Placement top of the page below the ads
Background color none / totally blended none
Ad label small gray text to right of advertiser URL n/a
Sitelinks often 5 or 6 usually none, unless branded query
Extensions star ratings, etc. typically none
Keyword bolding on for title, description, URL & sitelinks off
Underlines ad title & sitelinks, URL on scroll over off
Click target entire background of ad area is clickable only the listing title is clickable

 

Though the revenue juicing stuff from above wasn’t present in the screenshot Mozilla shared about Yahoo!’s new clean search layout they will offer Firefox users.

It shows red ad labels to the left of the ads and bolding on both the ads & organics.

Here is Marissa Mayer’s take:

At Yahoo, we believe deeply in search – it’s an area of investment and opportunity for us. It’s also a key growth area for us – we’ve now seen 11 consecutive quarters of growth in our search revenue on an ex-TAC basis. This partnership helps to expand our reach in search and gives us an opportunity to work even more closely with Mozilla to find ways to innovate in search, communications, and digital content. I’m also excited about the long-term framework we developed with Mozilla for future product integrations and expansion into international markets.

Our teams worked closely with Mozilla to build a clean, modern, and immersive search experience that will launch first to Firefox’s U.S. users in December and then to all Yahoo users in early 2015.

Even if Microsoft is only getting a slice of the revenues, this makes the Bing organic & ad ecosystem stronger while hurting Google. (Unless of course this is a step 1 before Marissa finds a way to nix the Bing deal and partner back up with Google on search). Yahoo! already has a partnership to run Google contextual ads. A potential Yahoo! Google search partnership was blocked back in 2008. Yahoo! also syndicates Bing search ads in a contextual format to other sites through Media.net and has their Gemini Stream Ads product which powers some of their search ads on mobile devices and on content sites is a native ad alternative to Outbrain and Taboola. When they syndicate the native ads to other sites, the ads are called Yahoo! Recommends.

Both Amazon and eBay have recently defected (at least partially) from the Google ad ecosystem. Amazon has also been pushing to extend their ad network out to other sites.

Greg Sterling worries this might be a revenue risk for Firefox: “there may be some monetary risk for Firefox in leaving Google.” Missing from that perspective:

  • How much less Google paid Mozilla before the most recent contract lifted by a competitive bid from Microsoft
  • If Bing goes away, Google will drastically claw down on the revenue share offered to other search partners.
    • Google takes 45% from YouTube publishers
    • Google took over a half-decade (and a lawsuit) to even share what their AdSense revenue share was
    • look at eHow’s stock performance
    • While Google’s search ad revenue has grown about 20% per year their partner ad network revenues have stagnated as their traffic acquisition costs as a percent of revenue have dropped

The good thing about all the Google defections is the more networks there are the more opportunities there are to find one which works well / is a good fit for whatever you are selling, particularly as Google adds various force purchased junk to their ad network – be it mobile “Enhanced” campaigns or destroying exact match keyword targeting.

Categories: 

Powered by WPeMatico

Measuring SEO Performance After "Not Provided"

In recent years, the biggest change to the search landscape happened when Google chose to withhold keyword data from webmasters. At SEOBook, Aaron noticed and wrote about the change, as evermore keyword data disappeared.

The motivation to withold this data, according to Google, was privacy concerns:

SSL encryption on the web has been growing by leaps and bounds. As part of our commitment to provide a more secure online experience, today we announced that SSL Search on https://www.google.com will become the default experience for signed in users on google.com.

At first, Google suggested it would only affect a single-digit percentage of search referral data:

Google software engineer Matt Cutts, who’s been involved with the privacy changes, wouldn’t give an exact figure but told me he estimated even at full roll-out, this would still be in the single-digit percentages of all Google searchers on Google.com

…which didn’t turn out to be the case. It now affects almost all keyword referral data from Google.

Was it all about privacy? Another rocket over the SEO bows? Bit of both? Probably. In any case, the search landscape was irrevocably changed. Instead of being shown the keyword term the searcher had used to find a page, webmasters were given the less than helpful “not provided”. This change rocked SEO. The SEO world, up until that point, had been built on keywords. SEOs choose a keyword. They rank for the keyword. They track click-thrus against this keyword. This is how many SEOs proved their worth to clients.

These days, very little keyword data is available from Google. There certainly isn’t enough to keyword data to use as a primary form of measurement.

Rethinking Measurement

This change forced a rethink about measurement, and SEO in general. Whilst there is still some keyword data available from the likes of Webmaster Tools & the AdWords paid versus organic report, keyword-based SEO tracking approaches are unlikely to align with Google’s future plans. As we saw with the Hummingbird algorithm, Google is moving towards searcher-intent based search, as opposed to keyword-matched results.

Hummingbird should better focus on the meaning behind the words. It may better understand the actual location of your home, if you’ve shared that with Google. It might understand that “place” means you want a brick-and-mortar store. It might get that “iPhone 5s” is a particular type of electronic device carried by certain stores. Knowing all these meanings may help Google go beyond just finding pages with matching words

The search bar is still keyword based, but Google is also trying to figure out what user intent lays behind the keyword. To do this, they’re relying on context data. For example, they look at what previous searches has the user made, their location, they are breaking down the query itself, and so on, all of which can change the search results the user sees.

When SEO started, it was in an environment where the keyword the user typed into a search bar was exact matching that with a keyword that appears on a page. This is what relevance meant. SEO continued with this model, but it’s fast becoming redundant, because Google is increasingly relying on context in order to determine searcher intent & while filtering many results which were too aligned with the old strategy. Much SEO has shifted from keywords to wider digital marketing considerations, such as what the visitor does next, as a result.

We’ve Still Got Great Data

Okay, if SEO’s don’t have keywords, what can they use?

If we step back a bit, what we’re really trying to do with measurement is demonstrate value. Value of search vs other channels, and value of specific search campaigns. Did our search campaigns meet our marketing goals and thus provide value?

Do we have enough data to demonstrate value? Yes, we do. Here are a few ideas SEOs have devised to look at the organic search data they are getting, and they use it to demonstrate value.

1. Organic Search VS Other Activity

If our organic search tracking well when compared with other digital marketing channels, such as social or email? About the same? Falling?

In many ways, the withholding of keyword data can be a blessing, especially to those SEOs who have a few ranking-obsessed clients. A ranking, in itself is worthless, especially if it’s generating no traffic.

Instead, if we look at the total amount of organic traffic, and see that it is rising, then we shouldn’t really care too much about what keywords it is coming from. We can also track organic searches across device, such as desktop vs mobile, and get some insight into how best to optimize those channels for search as a whole, rather than by keyword. It’s important that the traffic came from organic search, rather than from other campaigns. It’s important that the visitors saw your site. And it’s important what that traffic does next.

2. Bounce Rate

If a visitor comes in, doesn’t like what is on offer, and clicks back, then that won’t help rankings. Google have been a little oblique on this point, saying they aren’t measuring bounce rate, but I suspect it’s a little more nuanced, in practice. If people are failing to engage, then anecdotal evidence suggests this does affect rankings.

Look at the behavioral metrics in GA; if your content has 50% of people spending less than 10 seconds, that may be a problem or that may be normal. The key is to look below that top graph and see if you have a bell curve or if the next largest segment is the 11-30 second crowd.

Either way, we must encourage visitor engagement. Even small improvements in terms of engagement can mean big changes in the bottom line. Getting visitors to a site was only ever the first step in a long chain. It’s what they do next that really makes or breaks a web business, unless the entire goal was that the visitor should only view the landing page. Few sites, these days, would get much return on non-engagement.

PPCers are naturally obsessed with this metric, because each click is costing them money, but when you think about it, it’s costing SEOs money, too. Clicks are getting harder and harder to get, and each click does have a cost associated with it i.e. the total cost of the SEO campaign divided by the number of clicks, so each click needs to be treated as a cost.

3. Landing Pages
We can still do landing page analysis. We can see the pages where visitors are entering the website. We can also see which pages are most popular, and we can tell from the topic of the page what type of keywords people are using to find it.

We could add more related keyword to these pages and see how they do, or create more pages on similar themes, using different keyword terms, and then monitor the response. Similarly, we can look at poorly performing pages and make the assumption these are not ranking against intended keywords, and mark these for improvement or deletion.

We can see how old pages vs new pages are performing in organic search. How quickly do new pages get traffic?

We’re still getting a lot of actionable data, and still not one keyword in sight.

4. Visitor And Customer Acquisition Value

We can still calculate the value to the business of an organic visitor.

We can also look at what step in the process are organic visitors converting. Early? Late? Why? Is there some content on the site that is leading them to convert better than other content? We can still determine if organic search provided a last click-conversion, or a conversion as the result of a mix of channels, where organic played a part. We can do all of this from aggregated organic search data, with no need to look at keywords.

5. Contrast With PPC

We can contrast Adwords data back against organic search. Trends we see in PPC might also be working in organic search.

For AdWords our life is made infinitesimally easier because by linking your AdWords account to your Analytics account rich AdWords data shows up automagically allowing you to have an end-to-end view of campaign performance.

Even PPC-ers are having to change their game around keywords:

The silver lining in all this? With voice an mobile search, you’ll likely catch those conversions that you hadn’t before. While you may think that you have everything figured out and that your campaigns are optimal, this matching will force you into deeper dives that hopefully uncover profitable PPC pockets.

6. Benchmark Against Everything

In the above section I highlighted comparing organic search to AdWords performance, but you can benchmark against almost any form of data.

Is 90% of your keyword data (not provided)? Then you can look at the 10% which is provided to estimate performance on the other 90% of the traffic. If you get 1,000 monthly keyword visits for [widgets], then as a rough rule of thumb you might get roughly 9,000 monthly visits for that same keyword shown as (not provided).

Has your search traffic gone up or down over the past few years? Are there seasonal patterns that drive user behavior? How important is the mobile shift in your market? What landing pages have performed the best over time and which have fallen hardest?

How is your site’s aggregate keyword ranking profile compared to top competitors? Even if you don’t have all the individual keyword referral data from search engines, seeing the aggregate footprints, and how they change over time, indicates who is doing better and who gaining exposure vs losing it.

Numerous competitive research tools like SEM Rush, SpyFu & SearchMetrics provide access to that type of data.

You can also go further with other competitive research tools which look beyond the search channel. Is most of your traffic driven from organic search? Do your competitors do more with other channels? A number of sites like Compete.com and Alexa have provided estimates for this sort of data. Another newer entrant into this market is SimilarWeb.

And, finally, rank checking still has some value. While rank tracking may seem futile in the age of search personalization and Hummingbird, it can still help you isolate performance issues during algorithm updates. There are a wide variety of options from browser plugins to desktop software to hosted solutions.

By now, I hope I’ve convinced you that specific keyword data isn’t necessary and, in some case, may have only served to distract some SEOs from seeing other valuable marketing metrics, such as what happens after the click and where do they go next.

So long as the organic search traffic is doing what we want it to, we know which pages it is coming in on, and can track what it does next, there is plenty of data there to keep us busy. Lack of keyword data is a pain, but in response, many SEOs are optimizing for a lot more than keywords, and focusing more on broader marketing concerns.

Further Reading & Sources:

Categories: 

Powered by WPeMatico

6 Ways to Make Your Posts More Actionable

action

Do you ever feel that your content just isn’t reaching your audience as well as you’d like it to?

…and that even though you’ve created something of value, it doesn’t seem like anyone’s actually taking your advice and implementing it?

I’ll let you in on a secret…

Almost every content marketer has felt this way at one point or another.

It’s difficult to create content that resonates with your readers, but it’s even more difficult to create content that inspires action.

Want to make your post more actionable? Then follow these 6 ways.

And not for the reason you think. 

Yes, people are lazy. Not all, but I’d say it’s fair to call most readers in a typical audience lazy.

But still, some of those lazy people should take action, right? And most of the rest of your audience should take action too, right?

So, why aren’t they? The most likely reason is that your content isn’t actionable enough.

Content marketers talk about storytelling, copywriting formulas, and other tactics to make better content. And all of that is important.

But actionability is a concept that’s rarely talked about, and it’s enormously underrated. Actionable content is almost always great content, and it’s one of the main things you should be striving to create.

Why actionable content is difficult—but crucial—to make: The reason why it’s hard to make your content actionable comes from your inability to fully empathize with your readers.

You might write something that seems obvious to you, but it won’t be to someone with less experience in your niche.

As soon as you do that once, a reader can’t fully follow the rest of your content.

And there are a few really big consequences of this:

  1. Your reader can’t take action because they don’t know what to do. Figuring it out might be possible, but it’s quite difficult to figure out some things without some guidance.
  2. Your reader loses interest. If it’s not clear how to apply some of your advice in your content, then there’s really no point for the reader to pay close attention.

To put it simply, content that isn’t actionable is not good for the reader.

But it also sucks for you too. You put in a lot of effort to create your content, and you want readers to get the full value of what you made.

It’s disappointing when your work has no real impact.

That’s why I’m going to show the six ways you can make your posts more actionable.

If you implement most of these on a regular basis, you’ll see some great things.

All of a sudden, you’ll get comments from readers telling you how your advice helped them improve their lives in a big way. And it’s going to be one of the most rewarding parts of creating content for you.

Pay close attention, and then actually apply the tactics I’m about to show you. I made them really actionable so that you can implement them right away.

1. Use this one phrase as often as possible…

If there’s one instant change that you can implement to make your content more actionable, it’s this:

Whenever you finish giving a piece of advice, follow it up with a sentence that starts with “For example,…”

If you’ve read my posts in the past, you know that I use this phrase all the time:

image14

At first, this will take a conscious effort to do. Eventually, it will become your second nature.

The reason why it’s so powerful is because it makes it next to impossible to miss anything that requires further explanation.

For example (see what I did here?), pretend you are writing a post on building a website.

One major topic that you would include is picking a CMS.

Here’s what a snippet of your content might look like:

To make managing your website and its contents easier, you can use a simple content management system (CMS).

Next, you will need to pick a theme…

It might be obvious to you how to choose a CMS, but to someone new to the topic, it isn’t.

Let’s try that again, using our new phrase:

To make managing your website and its contents easier, you can use a simple content management system (CMS).

For example, you could choose from:

  • WordPress
  • Joomla
  • Drupal

Next, you will need to pick a theme…

I think it’d be good to go into more detail on each of the platforms, but this is already much more actionable for a reader.

Instead of having to read up on what a CMS is and what the different options are, the reader now has three good options to start with.

This quick example also illustrates that what comes after the “for example” phrase also matters. But don’t worry, I’m about to show you a few different ways you can make sure it’s as useful as possible.

2. Visuals are usually better than text

Earlier, I mentioned two main reasons why your readers don’t take action.

Some are just lazy, so you can’t really worry about them.

But the other ones just don’t have all the knowledge and guidance they need to take action. And that’s something you can fix.

To do that, we have to look at different ways readers might be missing information.

The first is they simply don’t understand what you wrote. Some things are very difficult to explain clearly in text.

Often, though, they are easy to explain with pictures.

The best example of this can be found in articles about building or baking something—anything to do with a procedure.

A simple picture can illustrate exactly what you’re talking about, like this picture in a pie recipe:

image16

If you just explained the step in writing, maybe half of your readers would know for certain what they’re trying to do here.

But with the picture (and text), I’m sure just about everyone would understand what they need to do.

Add up that difference for the 10+ steps in the recipe, and you can see how having pictures to accompany each step makes the content as a whole much more actionable.

There’s no more guessing or uncertainty about whether the procedure would work because a reader can follow along your example.

The takeaway:

Any time you describe how to use a tool or item of any kind, include a picture demonstrating the procedure.

This is another way to make your content instantly more actionable, and it doesn’t take any special kind of genius, just an extra bit of effort.

You can create the pictures yourself or try to find some online (always give credit).

3. How is just as important as What

Any advice you give in your posts revolves around what to do.

You tell your reader what they should do to achieve certain results.

For example, I’m showing you different tactics that you can use to make your posts more actionable.

But as we talked about earlier, not all readers will be able to implement your advice just based on the “what.”

If they don’t have the prior experience and knowledge, your advice isn’t going to be all that useful.

The solution is to always provide detailed procedures of “how” to do things or to illustrate concepts.

The image tactic from the previous section may fall into this category, but there are other ways to clearly demonstrate procedures. You can use:

  • screenshots
  • gifs
  • videos
  • drawings

They all have their best uses, depending on a particular situation.

Screenshots are great for showing readers how to do a particular step on their computer.

I use screenshots all the time. Here’s an example of one I included in a past article where I was showing you how to create goals in Google Analytics:

image29

In another post I wrote, I explained how to create great explainer videos because my readers might not have much experience with video marketing.

An example of a great video would help them know what to expect and what a great video looks like. I embedded it right into the content:

image00

Videos are better when you’re trying to illustrate more than just a few things; otherwise, images are easier.

The great news is that it’s really easy to embed videos.

You can find high quality video tutorials or examples of concepts for just about everything on YouTube.

Once you found a suitable video, scroll underneath it, click the “Share” button, and then click the “Embed” tab:

image07

This will give you a simple iframe HTML code that you can copy and paste into your content.

image12

Finally, there are animated gifs (small clips of video without sound).

Gifs are great for a few different purposes. First of all, they’re entertaining and can make your content a lot more fun to read.

But since we’re focusing on actionability, know that gifs can be used in place of videos. At times, you might want to show a small part of a video as an example without having to embed the whole thing.

I’m going to show you in a second how you can clip a part of a video and make it into an animated gif.

Actually, I’m going to show you a few tools right now that will make creating any of these much easier.

Tool #1 – Techsmith Snagit (for screenshots and video): As I mentioned, in almost every article I write, I include annotated screenshots for the reasons we went over above.

This tool is a simple browser plugin that makes creating screenshots really easy.

To use it, click the icon on your browser (once you’ve installed the tool), which will trigger a black sidebar to pop up on the right.

From here, you have four different options. In most cases, you’ll pick “region,” which allows you to take a screenshot of a certain part of the screen only:

image02

If you pick the “region” option, you simply drag a box around a part of your current browser screen that you want to capture. You can drag the corners to resize the box if you mess up on your first try:

image23

When it looks good, click the camera icon below the box.

That will capture your selection and open a new tab with it. Here, you can add arrows, boxes, circles, and text.

image10

The only downside is that you have a limited number of colors to choose from, but that’s not usually a big deal.

Once you’re done annotating the image, you click the blue button in the bottom right to download the picture or get a link to it.

If you’re trying to explain a multi-step procedure, a video might be better than several pictures. In that case, choose the video option from the original black sidebar. It will capture your screen as a video until you stop it.

Tool #2 – Evernote Web Clipper/Skitch (for screenshots): Snagit is typically the simplest option when it comes to annotated screenshots. However, sometimes it’s not enough.

Sometimes, you will want a more attractive screenshot, or you want to take a screenshot of something not in your browser (like your desktop or a folder).

That’s where this second option, made by Evernote, is better.

The web clipper is again a browser plugin. When you click its icon, you’ll get a pop-up, just like with Snagit:

image06

These are the same options, just with different names.

Mostly, you’ll be using the “screenshot” option, which allows you to select a part of the screen.

One drawback is that once you select a part of the screen, you can’t adjust it. If you mess it up, you’ll have to do it again.

After you get what you like, it’ll open in a new tab where you can annotate it.

image03

This tool has two main advantages over Snagit:

  • More options – In addition to having all the basic options, you can add labels, draw, and even blur parts of the picture.
  • More attractive – In my opinion, the arrows and other annotations look better.

Then, you can save the picture to your Evernote account and use it whenever you need it.

Sometimes, you’ll want to add annotations to pictures that aren’t in your browser. In that case, you’ll want to use Skitch, which is simply the offline equivalent for the web clipper that you install on your computer.

It has all the same options plus a few extra (like more colors):

image20

Tool #3 – Giphy Gif Maker (to make animated gifs): Very few marketers use gifs, and even fewer know how to make them.

This tool makes it easy to create gifs, and it allows you to make them straight from YouTube videos.

Let me quickly walk you through the steps.

First, you input the URL of the YouTube video (or URL from Vimeo or Vine):

image25

For this example, let’s use that video I showed you earlier in the article, the Dollar Shave Club ad.

Once you put in the URL, it will automatically load a preview of the video with a few key options:

  • start time – the timestamp in the video where you want the gif to start
  • duration – how long you want the gif to go for (from the start time)
  • caption – any text you want to display on the gif

image19

When it looks good, scroll down and click the “advanced” tab. From there, click the download button to save a copy of the gif.

image11

Finally, just upload it into your content like you would with a normal image, and voilà:

image18

You can also use Giphy as a gif search engine. Instead of making your own gif, you might one already made by someone else. Just search a few keywords.

image13

If there is a gif, you’ll likely find it.

4. Make the right things actionable

This is where things get a bit tricky…

There is a such thing as having too much actionability.

If you, by default, explain how to do every single thing you mention, your content is going to be filled with some very useful stuff and some very useless things.

While too actionable is better than not actionable enough, you want to find the sweet spot.

Let me give you a few examples of where it would be a bad idea to expand.

First, consider my example of baking a pie that I gave you earlier that illustrated how effective images can be.

Imagine if I had included a full tutorial on baking a pie. Would that add any value to my post?

No, of course not.

You don’t need to know how to bake a pie in order to understand how images can improve actionability.

That’s an extreme example so that you get what I’m talking about in general.

Now, let’s look at a more subtle example.

I often write about tools, e.g., tools that help you work as a team to create content. In these, I’ll provide tutorials on the most important functions of the tools in my list.

For example, here’s a tutorial of how to use the sharing function in Google docs:

image24

But Google docs has tons of features. There are probably hundreds—if you really dug in.

Should I give a tutorial for each and every one?

What about how to make tables, or format a page, or create custom bullets?

The simple answer is no, I don’t need to include tutorials for those.

That’s because only a minority of my readers would find those useful.

Even if I mention in my post that a table can be useful, that doesn’t mean I need to provide a tutorial on tables to make the post more actionable.

You want to focus on making the essential concepts you are explaining actionable, not the secondary ones.

You will have to make some judgement calls.

When you’re not sure if you should expand on a concept, ask yourself: “Do my readers need to know how to do this in order to put my advice into action?”

In the case of the Google Docs tool article, readers would have to know how to share articles with their co-workers, but they wouldn’t necessarily need to know how to create tables.

That’s the difference.

5. Calls to action can be powerful motivators

We’ve already looked at some reasons why people don’t take action when they read your content even if it has a valuable message.

One of them was not knowing what to do. But once they know that, it becomes a question of when to do it.

As you might know from firsthand experience, if we don’t do something right away, it’s very easy to forget about it and never do it.

That’s why so many readers simply bookmark articles and tell themselves that they’ll come back later and take action. Most never do.

This means that your goal is to get them to take action right then and there, while they’re reading your post (or immediately after).

To do this, you have to call out your audience. You need to explicitly tell your readers to take action and do something at a specific time.

There are two general ways to do this.

The first is to include these call-outs as instructions throughout your content.

In posts about step-by-step strategies, this works very well.

For example, here’s an excerpt from a post I published about creating a content marketing plan.

image15

In that sentence that I put in a box, I explicitly tell the reader to take action. They’re supposed to apply the advice I just gave them about naming their audience and then take action by writing it down.

What you’ll find is that if you make that first step easy to do, you can get a lot of readers to start taking action. Then, they build the momentum, and it’ll be increasingly easier to get them to continue taking action as you move them through the steps.

Later in that article, I again urge the reader to write down a list of their readers’ problems:

image28

Before that point, I’ve given them all the advice they need to take that action easily.

I’m not going to go through them all, but throughout that post, I’ve broken down overall big actions into small, manageable steps at the right times.

The second approach is to put a call to action at the end of the post, in a conclusion.

This is useful for posts that aren’t necessarily step-by-step or for those cases when you need to understand all of the material before you can apply any of it effectively.

In most of my conclusions, I give next steps a reader can take:

image26

In the post I am using as an example, I specifically tell the reader to make their own list of points to include in their content and then to use it.

It’s not complicated, but it basically singles out the reader and makes it clear that the time to take action is now.

One final thing to keep in mind is that you don’t want to ask too much of your reader.

If you tell them to create a website from scratch, that’s a lot of work, and most readers won’t have time for that.

If the takeaway advice from your content is a big ask, then give them a way to make it easier.

Either tell them to start with one small piece of it, or give them a tool that helps them do it faster.

For example, in that same post, I offered a printable sheet of my 11-point content framework:

image05

I knew it would be easier for the readers to create their plans based on my summary rather than start from scratch using the full article as their knowledge base.

6. Engaged audiences are more likely to take action

This final way of making your posts more actionable addresses the elephant in the room:

Readers are lazy.

According to the 1% rule, only about 1% of forum users actually post regularly; most of them will only read, passively lurking around:

image09

The same is true for most blogs. Most readers will skim posts but never take action.

I told you it’s difficult to get lazy people to do anything, and it’s true, but there is something you can do to encourage even lazy people to take action.

The solution is to get them to engage with the content.

That means to get them to the point when they are actively reading it, thinking about what you wrote, and taking some sort of action throughout the content.

Creating engaging content is actually pretty hard. Surveys have shown that up to 58% of marketers struggle to produce engaging content:

image27

But don’t worry, I have a few easy solutions for you.

The first is a big one, and it’s using interactive content wherever possible. Interactive content describes any content with which the user can interact (shocking, I know). This might mean clicking, typing something in, etc.

The reason why interactive content leads to engagement can be seen in a recent study on university students.

They looked at different teaching methods and found that the teachers who used interactive teaching methods had an engagement rate that was double the norm and had an attendance rate 20% higher than normal.

So, on top of getting your readers focused on your content while creating some momentum so that they apply your advice, you’re also going to attract more readers in the first place.

Pretty cool, right?

The main way you can do this is to embed social media. This breaks up the content with something different and allows the reader to take action and engage with it, leading to all those other benefits.

Embedding social media in posts: In most cases, you’ll stick to embedding tweets and Facebook posts.

While Twitter has some native embed options, I suggest using a plugin such as TweetDis, which allows you to insert attractive tweets in seconds.

If you buy TweetDis, once you install it, you’ll see an icon in all of your post editors:

image01

In order to use it, highlight the text you want to be tweetable, and then click the icon.

The resulting pop-up has a few simple options.

image08

The first menu, “Add,” lets you pick the type of tweet you want. A “box” tweet looks like one that you’d see on Twitter itself, while a “hint” simply adds a highlighted link to your content that readers can tweet.

The hint is shown below:

image21

Getting the reader to switch from a passive consumption mode to an active mode (of sharing in this case) is a great way to boost engagement.

I haven’t come across any great options to embed Facebook posts, so you’ll have to do that the hard way.

If you make a post that you want to embed (or find someone else’s), you can click the drop-down arrow in the corner and choose the “Embed Post” option:

image22

That will give you an HTML code that you can paste into your content. Then, it will show up just like a Facebook post in your content:

image04

Your readers will be able to like, comment on, and share it right from that embedded post.

There are many other ways you can use interactive content effectively, which is why I recommend reading my full guide on the topic.

Ask questions frequently in your content: The other way to engage readers in your content is to simply ask questions.

Don’t let them just read your statements; ask them questions that make them stop and think a little bit.

I do this all the time in my posts:

image17

Overall, it makes the content feel much more like a conversation rather than a one-sided lecture.

Finally, there are two important things to keep in mind when you ask your questions:

  1. Don’t ask stupid questions – Readers will feel that the questions are out of place.
  2. Always answer your own questions – Even if most of your readers might know the answer, not all will. Answering the question yourself ensures that everyone stays on the same page.

Conclusion

If you want your content to have a big impact on your readers’ lives, you need those readers to take action.

Not only is it good for them but it’s also good for your content marketing results. Readers who experience good results from your advice will become loyal fans and, often, customers.

I’ve shown you six different ways to make your posts more actionable.

Start with one or two tactics, and once you are comfortable with them, come back and apply the rest.

I’d love it if you shared the results you’ve had from implementing any of these methods. Leave your thoughts in a comment below.

Powered by WPeMatico